One thing I've been thinking about a lot lately is that I want to take pictures like a diary.
I have a tendency to take photos with a "work of art" approach, and I thought, "Isn't this too random? The question may come to mind.
"Wouldn't it be more correct to take more shots and aim for a home run from them, instead of scrutinizing them while trying to increase the batting average of the photos you can use?
There are times when I think so.
Of course, there's no such thing as which is right or wrong. If you shoot a lot of shutters, you may feel that you need to focus on one more cut.
Manipulation and inaction.
Is it ideal to be able to take random, well-honed photos?
In order to do so, countless shutters are necessary.
It's like a Zen questionnaire, but the mode these days is that maybe we should base the idea of "quality in quantity" on basically shooting a lot of numbers.
